Parliament's Finance Committee scrutinises the management and spending of resources within the House of Commons. As a Commons select committee, it examines financial administration and operational efficiency through regular meetings and oral evidence sessions with senior parliamentary staff. The committee holds the Administration to account for how public money is deployed across parliamentary functions. In November 2025, members questioned officials on progress in the Finance Savings programme, specifically examining plans to reduce costs in the estates and information technology operations. This inquiry forms part of the committee's broader oversight of Parliament's capital expenditure and modernisation priorities. The committee's work directly influences how the House manages its physical infrastructure and digital systems.
Meeting activity
1 sessions published in the last 12 months
MonWedFriSun
AugSeptOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAug
LessMore· cell = sessions per day
Select a day
Click any cell in the heatmap to see the sessions held that day and the insights extracted from them.
The Finance Committee’s Savings Inquiry (2025-11-25) scrutinised how Parliament plans to make cost savings across Strategic Estates, IT and catering, with emphasis on transparency, value-for-money, and delivery of a bold savings programme. Key commitments include replacing the 22-year-old finance system by 2027 (design start in autumn 2025, market in spring 2026, provider appointed and system replaced by end-2027), and forming a joined-up plan linking strategy, savings, and workforce plans for Committee sign‑off in early 2026. Witnesses stressed transparency on procurement costs (e.g., Victoria Tower tender costs and Peers’ Entrance security cost) and stated that tender-cost disclosures would be pursued where appropriate, including after contract award. The Inquiry highlighted large estate expenditure, described headcount growth driven by new activities (notably Parliamentary Security, Parliamentary Digital Service, and Strategic Estates), and outlined savings options such as capitalising staff costs and space-management (Tothill Street) including mothballing, subletting, or early exit. There were clear concerns about labour-cost pressures in catering, ongoing security expenditure, and the challenge of delivering break-even for catering, while also emphasising a culture of value-for-money and measurable outcomes for savings and digital initiatives. The session concluded with requests to publish security-capital costs (where possible) and to provide a private briefing on Derby Gate/New Palace Yard costs, alongside a request to bring forward budget plans in a single, joined-up package for Commission decisions in January–February 2026.