Economic Affairs Committee

LordsSelectest. 28 Jun 2001Email ↗● Actively Monitored
Sessions analysed34
Commitments18
Positions165
Recommendations116

Latest Signals

08 Sept 2026Devolution can support growth and more preventive public servicesPosition
“This is central to the case for fiscal devolution: it can unlock not just economic growth but good economic growth, inclusive economic growth, however you want to describe it. It puts local councils and strategic authorities in a position to more adequately address local needs, deliver on local priorities and exploit local opportunities. From my experience in Greater Manchester, I do not think it is a coincidence that the area with the most progressed and strongest devolution arrangements is also now the fastest growing, in relation to both GDP per head and productivity.”

Recent Sessions

View all (34)

Recent Commitments

View all (18)

Recent Recommendations

View all (116)

Frequent Witnesses

Office for Budget Responsibility4× · 47 insights
HM Treasury3× · 45 insights
Bank of England3× · 37 insights
Institute for Fiscal Studies3× · 22 insights
London School of Economics2× · 17 insights
PIMCO2× · 16 insights

About this committee

The Economic Affairs Committee scrutinises economic policy and financial matters affecting the UK. This Lords select committee conducts detailed inquiries through oral evidence sessions with senior figures from government, independent institutions, and specialist organisations. The committee has devoted substantial time to examining the UK's fiscal framework, hosting witnesses from the Office for Budget Responsibility, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, and Treasury officials to probe how fiscal rules operate and whether they support long-term sustainability. Recent sessions explored the Office for Budget Responsibility's assessment of long-term fiscal risks and the ageing population's impact on public finances, with committee members questioning Robert Chote and other economic experts on framework effectiveness. The committee has also examined evidence from think tanks and international fiscal specialists including Célestin Debrun and Ethan Ilzetzki to assess whether current rules balance short-term flexibility with fiscal discipline.