National Security Strategy (Joint Committee)

JointSelectest. 13 Jan 2010Email ↗● Actively Monitored
Sessions analysed24
Commitments26
Positions99
Recommendations74

Latest Signals

03 Mar 2025Threat actors will move to sabotage if payments stopUniversity of OxfordPosition
[Speaker: Professor Sadie Creese] We will need to see some prioritisation of other forms of resilience, because we have got really good at understanding what can be done to be resilient to a demand that is placed on holding your data to ransom, but perhaps slightly less resilient to the availability question. What we can expect to see through 2025 and into next year is a beginning of a movement towards threats of sabotage, and it is not the case that all organisations understand what it might be to be resilient to that kind of threat.
03 Mar 2025The NCF’s resources and public scrutiny look limitedRoyal Holloway, University of LondonConcern
03 Mar 2025The NCF is legally constrained and should stay responsibleKing’s College LondonPosition
03 Mar 2025Public accountability for the NCF is not yet clear enoughRoyal Holloway, University of LondonConcern
03 Mar 2025Computer Misuse Act reform and cyber law frameworkRoyal Holloway, University of LondonLegislative

Recent Sessions

View all (24)
13 Jul 2026Deterrence, NATO Europe and UK burden-sharing
4 pos6 concern4 rec
22 Jun 2026Russian aggression: EU defence and sanctions
6 pos5 concern3 rec
18 May 2026Undersea cables: security, repair and resilience
5 commit4 pos4 concern2 rec
27 Apr 2026Societal resilience: national conversation and defence
1 commit3 pos1 concern5 rec1 disag
20 Apr 2026Societal resilience: Taiwan and Dutch models
4 commit5 pos1 concern1 rec

Recent Commitments

View all (26)

Recent Recommendations

View all (74)

Frequent Witnesses

King’s College London5× · 14 insights
Cabinet Office3× · 21 insights
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology3× · 19 insights
Chatham House3× · 13 insights
RUSI3× · 9 insights
Home Office2× · 16 insights

About this committee

This joint committee of both Houses scrutinises the delivery and implementation of the UK's National Security Strategy across all four pillars. It operates as a select committee in the Lords and takes oral evidence from government officials, security experts, and international witnesses. The committee has conducted sustained inquiry into the government's progress on NSS Pillar 1 (Resilience and Readiness), Pillar 2 (Nuclear deterrence), and Pillar 3 (Sovereign Capabilities), examining whether policy intentions translate into funded and resilient delivery mechanisms. Recent sessions have focused on China policy and security threats, with particular attention to espionage risks highlighted in evidence from Lords Hermer and Jones on Official Secrets Act enforcement. The committee has also widened its gaze to international dimensions, comparing societal resilience approaches in Taiwan and the Netherlands, and explored emerging threats to democratic integrity including cryptocurrency's role in political finance. Its work reflects concern that strategic commitments require sustained investment and institutional preparedness across civilian and defence sectors.